It looks as though there is already research being done in the area of 3D mapping. My fellow PhD research student Yin-Ren Chang in the Modern Holography Group at De Montfort has informed me that Chiang Mei-Yi a researcher in Taiwan has produced a research paper for her Master's degree entitled "The depth of spatial research in the holographic-stereo contour map".
However I don't believe anyone is looking at representing time in three-dimensions. I hope not!
Tuesday, 29 March 2011
Sunday, 27 March 2011
Three-dimensional data
I'm wondering whether lentular imaging can be used to display three-dimensional astronomical data effectively - for science communication purposes. There are R-Trees - methods of displaying relationships between layers of data, which could be illustrated using lenticular imaging/digital holography. The information is described/labelled as being either 'parent' or 'child' so different generations of data could be shown on different layers within a lenticular image.
I'm interested in using layers of space within a lenticular to represent different time periods. The further back within the image plane the data is placed - the further back in time the data. Life cycles of stars could be shown easily using this technique - posters suitable for GCSE science students/general public.
I'm interested in using layers of space within a lenticular to represent different time periods. The further back within the image plane the data is placed - the further back in time the data. Life cycles of stars could be shown easily using this technique - posters suitable for GCSE science students/general public.
Topographic map I am also imagining that contour maps could be represented in three-dimensions - although the depth within in the image plane would not represent time in this instance. |
And what about weather maps? Depth within the lenticular can also be used to represent pressure or temperature.
I was introduced to the work of Eduard Tufte by Dr Phil Uttley last week who researched the graphic representation of data. All of this is intellectually interesting, but I don't yet have any emotional attachment to it. I would rather go back to working on three-dimensional family trees. This is perhaps though a secondary use for my research - and an arguement that it could be considered a contribution to knowledge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)